WebJan 19, 2010 · Hyundai objected to many of these discovery requests as “overly broad and unduly burdensome” and produced limited documents. Magaña did not move to compel … Weboverbroad merely because [it] may call for some information of doubtful relevance” so long as it is “reasonably tailored to include only matters relevant to the case.” Sanderson, 898 S.W.2d at 815. Significantly, whether a request for discovery is overbroad is distinct from whether it is burdensome or harassing. Allstate, 227 S.W.3d at 670.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

WebDespite that ruling, Judge Wilder-Doomes found the discovery requests to be “overbroad” and decided to “limit the requests in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 (b) (1)” . With regard to the Interrogatory, Judge Wilder-Doomes limited the request to “identifying all social media accounts that Plaintiff has used since the underlying ... WebJul 29, 2010 · “Overbroad” Valid only if the question calls for an undue burden such as “shotgun” interrogatories” as they are too general (i.e., “Please state the identity of each … gravity\u0027s rainbow pdfdrive

Plaintiff

WebJun 30, 2015 · Subject to and notwithstanding this objection, in responding to these discovery requests, Plaintiff will treat the term "third party," as extending to all individuals … WebDespite these Rule s, vague and overbroad discovery requests have continued, clogging the courts and increasing litigation costs. This Primer explores the origins of the “reasonable particularity” requirement, as well as the evolv-ing case law addressing the standard. The Primer provides practical guidance on how practitioners WebJun 17, 2015 · Many times discovery requests are overbroad. In such a situation: If a discovery request is overbroad, the responding party must, to comply with Rule 33 or Rule 34, explain the extent to which it is overbroad and answer or respond to the extent that it is not—and explain the scope of what the responding party is answering or responding to. chocolate covered stuffed dates recipe